Tuesday, November 19, 2013

We're hiring! [A marketing coordinator, a finance manager and a few curriculum writers who know Common Core]

Insight is growing and we're hiring! We've got a number of exciting opportunities available and we're looking for more great people to join our team. Pass the word!


Marketing Coordinator 

Do you have a passion for blogging, social media and just getting the word out about great work? And have K-12 experience on top of it? Then be sure to check out the full posting and shoot us your resume if you think you might be a fit.

Finance Manager 

Are you an experienced bookkeeper? Have experience with Dynamics GP? Do you have a passion for supporting a rapidly growing education company based in Los Angeles? Then learn more about the position and send us your resume. 


Curriculum Writers for Grades K-6 (Common Core) 

We're looking to hire contractors to write units and lessons in English/Language Arts and Math for grades K-6 through Insight’s lesson planning platform, myCore™. 

Writers need to have deep knowledge of the Common Core and demonstrated experience in writing units and lessons aligned to the Common Core.

Here are the grades/subjects still open:
  • Grade 1 ELA (4 units with six lessons each)
  • Grade 4 ELA (3 units with six lessons each)
  • Grade 5 Math (3 units with six lessons each)
  • Grade 6 ELA (3 units with six lessons each)
  • Grade 6 Math (3 units with six lessons each)

Learn more about job opportunities at Insight.

Monday, October 28, 2013

EdSurge Tech for Schools Summit - Here we come!

We're honored and excited to be one of 30 companies chosen to present at the EdSurge Tech for Schools Summit on this Saturday (Nov. 2) in Silicon Valley.

The event is designed to bring local educators and innovative ed tech entrepreneurs together, and provide opportunities for teachers to explore new products and to ask the tough questions of the entrepreneurs.

Jill Nyhus, Insight's VP of Business Development, and Nancy Goodman, Senior Project Director, plan to unveil and get feedback on Insight's new platform that provides meaningful feedback to classroom teachers through video-based observations, coaching and evaluations.

The event was announced after the overwhelming success of the first Tech for Schools Summit that was held in Rhode Island earlier in October.  The 30 companies that will participate at the Summit were subjected to a rigorous judging period, chosen by a panel of five independent judges from over 100 applicants.

The Tech for Schools Summit is a free, invite-only event open only to educators in Silicon Valley and Bay Area. EdSurge is co-hosting the event with NewSchools Venture Fund, Silicon Valley Education Foundation, and the Santa Clara County Office of Education.

Monday, October 21, 2013

Aligning Teacher Evaluation and the Common Core State Standards - Voice from the Field


The Common Core State Standards and teacher evaluation initiatives have great potential to prepare students for success in college and career and to improve teaching.

But the challenge is that in most states and districts these initiatives are not aligned. What would it look like if they were aligned, and how would teachers and students benefit?

Check out the guest article by Insight's Dr. Michael Moody and Maureen Sigler on EdNET Insight's Voice from the Field and let us know what you think!




Follow us on Twitter! @insighteducationgroup and @drmichaelmoody

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Another lesson in implementing the CCSS: Remember this is new

Here's another lesson in our "Implementing the Common Core" series from Insight Education's Dr. Michael Moody and Syracuse Superintendent Sharon Contreras.


Lesson: Remember this is new.


Dr. Moody: Give teachers the time and support they need to internalize this change, work with others to refine their practice with the standards, and break the work up into manageable chunks at the district and school levels. 
Superintendent Contreras: It’s important for us to be innovative in how we provide time, resources and administrative support for teachers. Otherwise, we will continue to hear about constraints rather than the awesome possibilities of the CCSS.   
Go directly to the source: teachers and building leaders are engaged in this work every day and have the most important insights into refining teaching and increasing student learning.

Check out more lessons in the SmartBlog on Education post [September 16, 2013] and in our previous blog posts.

Follow us on Twitter! 
@insighteducationgroup, @drmichaelmoody@SyracuseSchools and @SContrerasSCSD

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Implementing the Common Core: Support your teachers in multiple ways


Here's another lesson in our "Implementing the Common Core" series from Insight's Dr. Michael Moody and Syracuse Superintendent Sharon Contreras.


Lesson: Provide several ways to support teachers during implementation. 


Dr. Moody: Successful implementation requires a thoughtful rollout of the new standards, and supporting teachers is a process, not an event.  

In addition to traditional professional development that explains Common Core Standards and connects it to planning, instruction and assessment, consider providing on-going, game-changing supports like coaching and online learning.
Superintendent Contreras: Absolutely. In SCSD, we’re providing our teachers and school leaders with school-based coaching, professional development and a full array of supports throughout the entire school year. Our teachers and principals also have access to several online learning tools to support their rollout of the CCSS.
How are you supporting your teachers for the Common Core rollout in your district or school? Submit a comment below. 



Check out more lessons in the SmartBlog on Education post from September 16, 2013.

Follow us on Twitter! 
@insighteducationgroup, @drmichaelmoody@SyracuseSchools and @SContrerasSCSD

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Common Core Transition Guides for School-Level Leaders & Teachers


Implementation of the Common Core State Standards: A Transition Guide for School-level Leaders
The Aspen Institute, together with Education First, Insight Education Group, Student Achievement Partners and Targeted Leadership Consulting, have released "Implementation of the CCSS: A Transition Guide for School-Level Leaders." 

The guide provides specific steps and tools for successful transition to the new standards at the school level.

  • High-Impact Actions: Critical moves that the leadership team and other stakeholders should take to implement the indicator in their school.
  • Measures: Examples of ways to collect and analyze data to assess the implementation of each indicator.
  • Tools: Links to supporting materials that will help the leadership team and other stakeholders address the indicator. 

The guide also includes vignettes with discussion questions to encourage further exploration of the indicators among leadership team members and other school community members.



In addition, The Aspen Institute also released several new modules in its Tools for Teachers series, including:
  • Implementing the CCSS: The Role of ILTs and LASW
  • Close Reading and Text-Dependent Questions
  • Designing Close Reading Instruction
  • Engaging in Academic Writing
  • Text Complexity and the CCSS
Send us a note if there is anything we can do to support you in your Common Core implementation initiatives.
 


@InsightEdGroup & @drmichaelmoody

Monday, September 23, 2013

Implementing the Common Core: Determine your curriculum


Last week, Insight's Dr. Michael Moody and Syracuse Superintendent Sharon Contreras led a conversation featured in SmartBlog on Education about key lessons for school leaders to consider in implementing the Common Core.

Here's another lesson to consider.


Lesson: Determine the curriculum you will use.


Dr. Moody: A real challenge is determining if you’ll “make or buy” CCSS-Aligned curriculum.

While there is no right answer, it is important that there is an answer.  Implementing the Common Core is not as simple as identifying a “Common Core curriculum” and then training teachers to use it. 

The new standards require real changes in the way we teach, what we teach and even how we think about teaching. Embracing this change (and putting the necessary resources behind it) is critical.  
Superintendent Contreras: In Syracuse City School District, teachers are developing curricular units, lesson plans and assessments aligned to the CCSS. There is no better way for teachers to learn about or to become vested in the standards.
What do you think? Have more lessons you've learned? Share in the comments section below.

Follow us on Twitter! 
@insighteducationgroup, @drmichaelmoody@SyracuseSchools and @SContrerasSCSD

Monday, September 16, 2013

Implementing the Common Core: Set goals and monitor progress - frequently

Image courtesy of
syracusecityschools.com
We're excited to have a guest blog post today on SmartBlog on Education: Implementing the Common Core: 4 Lessons Learned for School and District Leaders. Check out the conversation between Superintendent Sharon Contreras from Syracuse City School District (NY) and our very own, Dr. Michael Moody, CEO of Insight Education Group. Let us know how the lessons resonate in your district or state.

In addition to the four lessons in SmartBlog, we're going to going to feature additional lessons here over the next few weeks. Here's one for today.


Set goals and monitor progress - frequently. 


Dr. Moody: Be clear with educators about expectations during each step of the process, assess for effectiveness, and address gaps immediately. Be careful not to wait too long to see what is sticking and what needs more attention. After all, the worst time to find about the success of your implementation is when you get the results of the new assessments. 
Superintendent Contreras: Yes, but I would add that you need to make sure you get enough feedback to actually address the gaps.  When you set up the process for getting feedback, you need to put forth effort to not only get good information, but then to use to the information to support students, teachers and building leaders.   
One of the problems we experienced is that we didn’t develop a robust enough feedback system.  We sent out online surveys, for example, and we didn’t hear from very many teachers.  Months went by and we thought things were going relatively smoothly.   
As we dug deeper, however, we realized most teachers were struggling with implementation of the CCSS.  They were struggling with teaching more rigorous content and in aligning curriculum and instructional practices.  
In retrospect, we acknowledged that there were probably more effective ways to gather and process feedback. For example, we should have solicited feedback about implementation more often and through multiple venues like focus groups and online teacher chat rooms. Consequently, in some instances we had to completely start over with curricular and/or assessment design.  
What do you think? Have more lessons you've learned? Share it in the comments below.

Follow us on Twitter! @insighteducationgroup, @drmichaelmoody@SyracuseSchools and @SContrerasSCSD

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Syracuse City School District: A Case Study in Teacher & School Leader Effectiveness


We're excited to partner again with Syracuse City School District (SCSD) for this upcoming school year.

During the 2011-2012 school year, SCSD and Insight created custom frameworks for both teachers and school leaders. 

Together, we created a taskforce bringing key stakeholders to the table, including teachers, principals, parents, university representatives and community members, to build the frameworks. 

Including these various stakeholder’s voices was an important part of the framework development process and continues to influence revisions to the frameworks.  

In 2012, SCSD was the first district in New York to win state approval to use a custom built, Common Core-aligned teacher framework and complementary leadership framework. Implementation of the frameworks is part of a larger effort to continue supporting and growing teaching and leadership talent in Syracuse.

Building on the successes over the past two school years, Insight will support SCSD's efforts to further support talent development, create robust professional development based on teacher performance data, calibrate teacher observers, and conduct quality school reviews.

Thursday, August 22, 2013

The Role of Video in Teacher Observations: Are we ready? - Vote for us @SXSWEdu


Insight is headed to SXSWedu in March 2014 - and we'd love to do our really cool panel called "The Role of Video in Teacher Observations: Are we ready?" And we need your vote!

SXSWedu uses results from a public voting process called PanelPicker as one of the criteria for selecting which panels are put on the final agenda. The process empowers the SXSWedu community to have a significant voice in the programming that will take place at the conference.

We'd love it if you could give us a vote! It'll only take a couple minutes.
  1. Log in to http://panelpicker.sxsw.com to create a new account to begin the voting process.
  2. Once logged in, go to our panel idea "Video in Teacher Observation: Are we ready?"
Thanks for your support and we look forward to seeing you in Austin!

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Interview with Dr. Michael Moody: Good professional development, Common Core, and technology

Dr. Michael Moody
Recently, Edtech Digest's Victor Rivero sat down with our very own Dr. Michael Moody, Insight's CEO, to discuss good professional development, Common Core, and the role of technology.

Victor: What does good PD [professional development] actually look like?


Michael: Good PD is about engaging teachers in a process in which they bring their own skills and knowledge to the table as a starting point for learning.  It is practical and models strategies that teachers can use in their classrooms.

Good PD gives learners time to grapple with concepts and apply new learning to their own classrooms, schools, or districts.

Importantly, PD must find its way into the classroom, meeting teachers where they are. This is most commonly referred to as job-embedded PD.  We know so much about how individuals (including teachers) learn.

Yet, we don’t often use this knowledge to build PD experiences that effectively grow teachers in their practice.  After all, we’re educators.  There is no reason that PD shouldn’t reflect everything we know about good teaching.

Victor: When people talk about ‘job-embedded’ PD, what does that actually mean?


Michael: Job-embedded PD means many things to many people, which contributes to the challenge of creating effective models.

Job-embedded PD is really about supporting the growth of teachers or administrators in their schools and classrooms, where it matters most.

“Traditional” PD is generally out of the classroom (or outside of school) and thus relies on a teacher’s ability to implement new learning without support or feedback.

If we can bring that learning to a teacher’s classroom, and use the instructional process to provide feedback and make adjustments, a teacher’s practice is much more likely to grow and improve.

Additionally, there is a lot of value in having teachers implement new strategies in their classrooms, with their students.

Victor: How are districts using PD to plan for and implement the Common Core?


Michael: It appears to me that districts are taking a variety of approaches when it comes to implementing the Common Core. In many cases, teachers are getting an overview of the new standards and the “instructional shifts” required by the standards.

However, given the significant changes in practice that are required by the Common Core, I think we’ll soon see how important a job-embedded approach really is.

Teachers need time to really “dig in” to the actual standards themselves, and have opportunities to plan lessons that reflect not only the new standards, but also the instructional strategies that will most effectively engage students.

myCore™ is Insight Education Group’s award-winning online platform for teachers and district leaders to plan and share lessons aligned to the Common Core State Standards.Born and developed from this need is Insight’s online planning tool, myCore, a cloud-based platform that empowers teachers to meet the rigor of the Common Core when planning standards- aligned lessons.

Following the job-embedded PD model, myCore provides teachers with coaching support when and where they need it.  We are hearing a lot about text dependent questioning, perseverance, etc., but districts haven’t yet identified the best way to provide models of effective instruction with the Common Core.

myCore includes model units and lesson and a full year’s worth of units and lessons for K-6 teachers.

While the initial step into the Common Core is critical, it’s going to be important for districts to provide on-going, sustained PD relative to instruction.

Check out the rest of the interview on Edtech Digest »


Tuesday, July 9, 2013

NCSC13 Session: Aligning the Common Core State Standards, Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness

Thanks to the many of you who attended our breakout session last week at the National Charter Schools Conference in Washington, DC. The session, "Aligning the Common Core State Standards, Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness," was led by Insight's Maureen Sigler.

For those of you who missed it, Maureen walked the audience through the bridge between teacher effectiveness and the Common Core. Here's how she broke it down:
  • Student readiness for postsecondary education and the workforce is WHY we teach.
  • Common Core State Standards provide a vision of excellence for WHAT we teach.
  • Frameworks and rubrics provide a vision of excellence for HOW we teach.
Download the handouts to learn more.
If you attended the session, we'd love to know your thoughts. Leave us your comments below or send us a message.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Teacher Evaluation and the Common Core

It seems as if the only two things we are discussing in education circles these days are teacher evaluation and the Common Core State Standards.  

On one hand, this is very exciting.  After all, how often is the entire field focused on an initiative that impacts schools across the country?  On the other hand, this is also producing some anxiety, as both of these initiatives are not only significant game-changers in terms of how we've operated for decades, but both have significant stakes attached to them.

Teaching to the Core: Integrating Implementation of Common Core and Teacher Effectiveness Policies.  At Insight, we've been focused on really understanding how each of these initiatives interact in order to provide a more comprehensive approach to "reform."  

And we're excited to see the Aspen Institute continue to push the conversation in Teaching to the Core: Integrating Implementation of Common Core and Teacher Effectiveness Policies.  

Importantly, the actions outlined in this publication (see page 2 for an overview of the recommendations) provide some very clear steps for districts thinking about how to integrate teacher effectiveness and the Common Core in order to maximize resources and streamline implementation.  

While this is still a big lift for schools and districts alike, it is indeed time that we bring the work of Common Core implementation into teacher evaluation systems to ensure we're all focused on what we think will have the greatest impact on the students we serve.

The Insight Core Framework

Equally exciting is the mention of the Insight Core Framework as a resource to support districts.  

Insight Core Framework

After significant amounts of research, our work in districts, and conversations with practitioners in the field, the Insight Core Framework was produced as a way of pushing this conversation and providing an example of how the language in teacher evaluation frameworks can be crafted to reflect actions of teachers relative to expectations of the Core.  

We know first-hand that this work is not easy. However, we also believe that it's the right work - and with focus and resolve this work has the potential to significantly change the classroom experience for kids across the country.

Learn more about the Insight Core Framework (including core practices for effective teaching with the Common Core).

Friday, April 12, 2013

Rabbit Holes...


WARNING, this is a rabbit hole we may not get out of in this blog entry.

Regularly. Most of the time. Infrequent. Sometimes. Consistently.   As Insight continues to work across different districts, time and time again educators and practitioners have expressed caution and pause about using these words in teaching and learning frameworks.  As the world of schooling continues to trend towards reaching agreements and sound definitions about effectiveness, our work has uncovered a considerable amount of angst about the practice of teaching becoming victimm to subjectivity.

How does one measure effectiveness?  And, is there a standard tipping point that can shift a behavior or action from ‘sometimes’ to ‘consistently’?  When this question is the lever that can move a rating from ‘Not effective’ to 'meets expectations', there can be lack of trust in an observer’s ability to rate teaching in a way that is both fair and just to the practitioner. 

Accountability is a dual-edged sword.  The age of accountability has inflicted pain and cut through controversial issues like tenure and compensation.  But, accountability has also given us an opportunity to sharpen our focus on what good teaching looks like.  Teaching is not a technical exercise that follows a ‘checklist’.  Good teaching is a practice that is grounded in sound research and is demonstrated by patterns that are intentional, purposeful, and disciplined. 

Intentional. Purposeful. Disciplined. Grounded. These descriptors of powerful practice should be the goal of every teacher looking to achieve mastery in their classrooms. It is highly likely that one will progress from 'sometimes' to 'regular' to 'consistent' in order to get to a disciplined, deep practice that leads to student achievement.  Given that, these proposed words still come with a bit of subjectivity; however, when they lead to strong practice - its less questionable.  We're still in the rabbit hole but, maybe, a little less deep.  

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Getting the biggest bang for our buck


Lengthen the school day.  Extend the school year.  Provide more extracurricular activities.  Supplement with ACT preparation courses.  These are some of the reactive initiatives that we see schools add to their programs in hopes of catching students up, in hopes of evening the playing field.  These initiatives, although an attempt, are often too little too late.  Children growing up in low-income communities begin kindergarten behind their more affluent peers.  When these same children have had no preschool experience they are even further behind.  Our schools are band-aiding a large problem—a crisis, really.  Where are the proactive measures? Where are the high-quality early childhood programs for * all * children?

National early childhood initiatives like Head Start have been around since the 60s and Johnson’s War on Poverty.  Yet, despite the large body of research that says early investment in children and families is the best way to mitigate the “failure of schools” and our entire economic system, we still do not have preschool for all families.  Our neediest families are the ones who have the least access.

But, why early childhood?  Why is this * the * vital proactive measure? High quality programs are proven to develop the critical executive function skills that allow children to develop into contributing adults and citizens.  High quality programs develop children’s language and critical thinking skills—skills that are essential for high performance on rigorous high-stakes tests in formal schooling—the same tests that determine the success or failure status of a school.

Early childhood education can break the cycle of poverty.  We live in a communicative world where the power of one’s voice and words is critical.  Children and families in poverty have little voice.  Not only can early intervention help children, it can help entire families by empowering them as advocates.  Early intervention proves to be a game changer in the lives of children growing up in poverty.

Over time, we’ve seen there is little argument that high-quality early childhood programs are a value add.  Obama supports it and philanthropists champion it.  Still, we don’t see politicians putting their money where their mouth is.  We still don’t see early childhood education access increasing on the whole.  Why not invest in this proactive measure?  Why not invest in programs that are shown to reduce incarceration rates while increasing the rate at which adults secure jobs?

We can continue to invest in the reactive measures that we hope will increase test scores and strengthen our schools.  However, we’ll continue to climb an uphill battle until we truly think about where our kids * start * falling behind. We need to be proactive not reactive.  We need to invest where we can work with children and their families to ensure they are truly off to a strong start.  Early childhood programs for all kids and families are truly the biggest bang for our buck.